4491699 Zoning Commission Notice of Further Hearing on Designated Issues: Case No. 05-36G (CASCO, Inc. & K Street Developers, LLC)  

  •  

    ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    NOTICE OF FURTHER HEARING ON DESIGNATED ISSUES

     

    TIME AND PLACE:              Thursday, September, 19, 2013, @ 6:00 P.M.          

                                                    Jerrily R. Kress Memorial Hearing Room

                                                    441 4th Street, NW, Suite 220

                                                    Washington, D.C. 20001

     

    CASE NO. 05-36G (CASCO, Inc. & K Street Developers, LLC - Modification of Previously-Approved PUD and Related Zoning Map Amendment @ Square 749)

     

    Pursuant to § 3025.1 and 3025.2 of the Zoning Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (Title 11 of the DCMR) the Commission gives notice to the participants in this proceeding that at its public meeting of July 29, 2013, the Commission re-opened the record of this case to require a further hearing limited to the issues discussed in the Report to the Zoning Commission of Steven E. Sher. (Exhibit 31.)  

     

    The hearing will consist of the direct testimony of Mr. Sher, his cross examination by Union Place Phase I, LLC[1], and redirect testimony.  Mr. Sher’s direct testimony may not exceed 10 minutes in length. 

     

    No other evidence will be received at the hearing.

     

    Information responsive to this notice should be forwarded to the Director, Office of Zoning, Suite 200-S, 441 4th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, YOU MAY CONTACT THE OFFICE OF ZONING AT (202) 727-6311.

     

    ANTHONY J. HOOD, MARCIE I. COHEN, ROBERT E. MILLER, PETER G. MAY, AND MICHAEL G. TURNBULL -------- ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, BY SARA A. BARDIN, DIRECTOR, AND BY SHARON S. SCHELLIN, SECRETARY TO THE ZONING COMMISSION.

     



    [1]  Although Advisory Neighborhood Commission 6C was automatically a party in this proceeding, it did not provide the information required by 11 DCMR § 3012.5 in order for it to participate in the hearing.